<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cel vs digital: does animation style affect overall quality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://animeyume.com/blog/index.php/2009/06/22/cel-vs-digital-does-animation-style-affect-overall-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://animeyume.com/blog/2009/06/22/cel-vs-digital-does-animation-style-affect-overall-quality/</link>
	<description>Mainichi Anime Yume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: justme</title>
		<link>http://animeyume.com/blog/2009/06/22/cel-vs-digital-does-animation-style-affect-overall-quality/#comment-94772</link>
		<dc:creator>justme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animeyume.com/blog/2009/06/22/cel-vs-digital-does-animation-style-affect-overall-quality/#comment-94772</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, cel or digital shouldn&#039;t be a factor for deciding wheter a show is good or bad, as a matter of fact, digital animation should deliver better quality/cost ratio (at least in theory). However, since 2000, i&#039;ve notice the budget has decrease a lot in the animation studios, or shall i say, the deliver time for a given show,  has decrease a lot beacuse of the competence, so quality has to be sacrifice.
As always, the &quot;old school&quot; was the best. 
As an example, the first season of Ranma 1/2, wich date from 1989, has a superb quality.
Well, just my 2cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, cel or digital shouldn&#8217;t be a factor for deciding wheter a show is good or bad, as a matter of fact, digital animation should deliver better quality/cost ratio (at least in theory). However, since 2000, i&#8217;ve notice the budget has decrease a lot in the animation studios, or shall i say, the deliver time for a given show,  has decrease a lot beacuse of the competence, so quality has to be sacrifice.<br />
As always, the &#8220;old school&#8221; was the best.<br />
As an example, the first season of Ranma 1/2, wich date from 1989, has a superb quality.<br />
Well, just my 2cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.216 seconds -->
